In
Strange Beliefs, written and produced by Bruce Dakowski, Sir Edward Evan Evans-Pritchard’s(E.P.) contribution to the field of Anthropology is documented. He is said to have “revolutionized” Anthropology by turning it away from the search for universal ways of human behaviour. Anthropologists rather, were to be seen as interpreters rather than scientists, and their task was the translation of culture.
E.P.’s debut work “Witchcraft, Oracles, and Magic among the Azande”, was produced from his interaction with the Azande back in 1926. E.P.’s study stemmed from his interest in how the Azande’s ideas could be pieced together to form their system of belief, and how it compared to his own. He found that the Azande’s underlying assumptions were different, exemplified by a rice granary. Now a granary, supported by wooden posts would be expected be worn down by termites and eventually collapse. Why it falls at a particular time on a particular person is something his culture called “bad luck”, or “by chance”. However, to the Azande, that sort of misfortune is believed to be caused by witchcraft. The Azande attributed any misfortune, particularly those fatal ones, to witchcraft. In E.P.’s words, “It is death that answers the riddle to mystical beliefs.” The witchdoctor is highly regarded in Azande land, and he is integral to their society because he is supposed be combat witchcraft, with his ceremonies of spells, substances and procedures. The Azande’s faith in witchcraft is so inherent that it is unshaken and not disproved by its failures.
Through his study of the Azande, E.P. sought to raise the question of what can be considered ‘rational thinking’ in any culture. Professor David Pocock of the University of Sussex, who was a student of E.P., comments that Azande express and manage envy, hate and spite through the concept of witchcraft. Witchcraft then, was a practical way of organizing life for the Azande.Before E.P., witchcraft and magic were loosely-used terms by the Western world, and meant to imply primitive and misguided thinking and behaviour. There were no study of African religions and were simply classified as mysticisim and odd beliefs. E.P.’s record of the Azande society, has led African religions to be treated with the same seriousness and philosophical thinking as world religions.
The second part of Strange Beliefs followed E.P. to Cairo, Egypt in 1932 where he acquired a university post. It was there he studied “Primitive Mentality”, particularly focused on human thought. In addition, he stressed the importance of history in Anthropology, much to the displeasure of his former teacher Malinoswki. E.P., wanted to learn more about the history of ideas and sought to utilise anthropology in a historical context. This is where E.P. was made famous by his conviction of Anthropology as not a natural science, but something that lies between humanities and the social science. Because it is not understandable at face value, anthropologists are to aid by being translators of the foreign culture, as how interpreters translate language.
Shortly after, E.P. was sent by his government to the land of Nuers, which led him to produce an ethnography of their society. The Nuer, were seen as problematic by his government, because there were a war-like tribe prone to aggressiveness and displayed strong resistance to being governed. E.P. discovered from his stay with the Nuers, that this was due to their egalitarian upbringing. The Nuers are described to be deeply democratic, easily prone to violence and find any sort of restraint irksome. Every Nuer considered himself as good as his neighbour and would “strut around like lords of the Earth, which they considered themselves to be.”
As fundamental as witchcraft is to the Azande, were cattles to the Nuers. Young boys would take the name of their favourite bulls, songs were composed about the beauty of the beast, and its presence in Nuer’s folklore abounded. Cattles were also used in social processes such as payment and compensation for settling feuds. E.P. described the cattle as “the idiom for the way the Nuer thinks”, highlighting its importance to the Nuer society. Rather than being organized by a legal institution, the Nuer’s lives are centred around the cattle. E.P. termed the political structure of the Nuer “ordered anarchy”, in which it is not ruled by any officer. This finding derived from the Nuer tribe, was another great contribution of E.P. as it challenged western political views of African societies, which stereotyped them as slaves.
Rather than accepting widespread belief of what is considered "irrational" and "primitive", E.P. managed to contest those notions, convincing his fellow anthropologists that those terms were irrelevant because the societies of the Azande and the Nuer, functioned no poorer than their own. What does not make sense in their culture, is actually they know as "common sense" to the Azande or the Nuer. Hence there can be no universal theory of human behaviour.
A common question often raised to anthropologists is, “why go out of their way to study other cultures when they can study their own?” In response, E.P. cites two reasons: Objectivity and Distinction. The former is developed and achieved through the study of “other people”, as it is easier to make correlations and observations in societies unlike one’s own. While the latter, distinction, is necessary for these remote societies to be studied in their entirety, and for their whole social life to be evaluated. By letting the people talk, the authority is shifted from the anthropologist to the people. The anthropologist then takes on the ideal position of being a translator, interpreting what he observes to the rest of the world.
In conclusion, the role of an anthropologist is best illustrated in E.P.’s analogy of one who is “not just member of the audience, but also on the stage.” This highlights the imperative requirement for the anthropologist to be active participants, rather than passive observers in order to effectively translate another’s culture.
Commentaries